git checkout [-q] [-f] [-m] [<branch>] git checkout [-q] [-f] [-m] --detach [<branch>] git checkout [-q] [-f] [-m] [--detach] <commit> git checkout [-q] [-f] [-m] [[-b|-B|--orphan] <new_branch>] [<start_point>] git checkout [-f|--ours|--theirs|-m|--conflict=<style>] [<tree-ish>] [--] <pathspec>...: git checkout [-f|--ours|--theirs|-m|--conflict=<style>] [<tree-ish>] --pathspec-from-file=<file> [--pathspec-file-nul] git checkout (-p|--patch) [<tree-ish>] [--] [<pathspec>...:]
Updates files in the working tree to match the version in the index or the specified tree. If no pathspec was given, git checkout will also update HEAD to set the specified branch as the current branch.
git checkout [<branch>]
If <branch> is not found but there does exist a tracking branch in exactly one remote (call it <remote>) with a matching name and --no-guess is not specified, treat as equivalent to
$ git checkout -b <branch> --track <remote>/<branch>
You could omit <branch>, in which case the command degenerates to "check out the current branch", which is a glorified no-op with rather expensive side-effects to show only the tracking information, if exists, for the current branch.
git checkout -b|-B <new_branch> [<start point>]
If -B is given, <new_branch> is created if it doesn't exist; otherwise, it is reset. This is the transactional equivalent of
$ git branch -f <branch> [<start point>] $ git checkout <branch>
that is to say, the branch is not reset/created unless "git checkout" is successful.
git checkout --detach [<branch>], git checkout [--detach] <commit>
When the <commit> argument is a branch name, the --detach option can be used to detach HEAD at the tip of the branch (git checkout <branch> would check out that branch without detaching HEAD).
Omitting <branch> detaches HEAD at the tip of the current branch.
git checkout [-f|--ours|--theirs|-m|--conflict=<style>] [<tree-ish>] [--] <pathspec>...:, git checkout [-f|--ours|--theirs|-m|--conflict=<style>] [<tree-ish>] --pathspec-from-file=<file> [--pathspec-file-nul]
The index may contain unmerged entries because of a previous failed merge. By default, if you try to check out such an entry from the index, the checkout operation will fail and nothing will be checked out. Using -f will ignore these unmerged entries. The contents from a specific side of the merge can be checked out of the index by using --ours or --theirs. With -m, changes made to the working tree file can be discarded to re-create the original conflicted merge result.
git checkout (-p|--patch) [<tree-ish>] [--] [<pathspec>...:]
-q, --quiet
--progress, --no-progress
-f, --force
When checking out paths from the index, do not fail upon unmerged entries; instead, unmerged entries are ignored.
--ours, --theirs
Note that during git rebase and git pull --rebase, ours and theirs may appear swapped; --ours gives the version from the branch the changes are rebased onto, while --theirs gives the version from the branch that holds your work that is being rebased.
This is because rebase is used in a workflow that treats the history at the remote as the shared canonical one, and treats the work done on the branch you are rebasing as the third-party work to be integrated, and you are temporarily assuming the role of the keeper of the canonical history during the rebase. As the keeper of the canonical history, you need to view the history from the remote as ours (i.e. "our shared canonical history"), while what you did on your side branch as theirs (i.e. "one contributor's work on top of it").
-b <new_branch>
-B <new_branch>
-t, --track
If no -b option is given, the name of the new branch will be derived from the remote-tracking branch, by looking at the local part of the refspec configured for the corresponding remote, and then stripping the initial part up to the "*". This would tell us to use hack as the local branch when branching off of origin/hack (or remotes/origin/hack, or even refs/remotes/origin/hack). If the given name has no slash, or the above guessing results in an empty name, the guessing is aborted. You can explicitly give a name with -b in such a case.
--no-track
--guess, --no-guess
$ git checkout -b <branch> --track <remote>/<branch>
If the branch exists in multiple remotes and one of them is named by the checkout.defaultRemote configuration variable, we'll use that one for the purposes of disambiguation, even if the <branch> isn't unique across all remotes. Set it to e.g. checkout.defaultRemote=origin to always checkout remote branches from there if <branch> is ambiguous but exists on the origin remote. See also checkout.defaultRemote in git-config(1).
--guess is the default behavior. Use --no-guess to disable it.
The default behavior can be set via the checkout.guess configuration variable.
-l
-d, --detach
--orphan <new_branch>
The index and the working tree are adjusted as if you had previously run git checkout <start_point>. This allows you to start a new history that records a set of paths similar to <start_point> by easily running git commit -a to make the root commit.
This can be useful when you want to publish the tree from a commit without exposing its full history. You might want to do this to publish an open source branch of a project whose current tree is "clean", but whose full history contains proprietary or otherwise encumbered bits of code.
If you want to start a disconnected history that records a set of paths that is totally different from the one of <start_point>, then you should clear the index and the working tree right after creating the orphan branch by running git rm -rf . from the top level of the working tree. Afterwards you will be ready to prepare your new files, repopulating the working tree, by copying them from elsewhere, extracting a tarball, etc.
--ignore-skip-worktree-bits
-m, --merge
When a merge conflict happens, the index entries for conflicting paths are left unmerged, and you need to resolve the conflicts and mark the resolved paths with git add (or git rm if the merge should result in deletion of the path).
When checking out paths from the index, this option lets you recreate the conflicted merge in the specified paths.
When switching branches with --merge, staged changes may be lost.
--conflict=<style>
-p, --patch
This means that you can use git checkout -p to selectively discard edits from your current working tree. See the "Interactive Mode" section of git-add(1) to learn how to operate the --patch mode.
Note that this option uses the no overlay mode by default (see also --overlay), and currently doesn't support overlay mode.
--ignore-other-worktrees
--overwrite-ignore, --no-overwrite-ignore
--recurse-submodules, --no-recurse-submodules
--overlay, --no-overlay
--pathspec-from-file=<file>
--pathspec-file-nul
<branch>
You can use the @{-N} syntax to refer to the N-th last branch/commit checked out using "git checkout" operation. You may also specify - which is synonymous to @{-1}.
As a special case, you may use A...B as a shortcut for the merge base of A and B if there is exactly one merge base. You can leave out at most one of A and B, in which case it defaults to HEAD.
<new_branch>
<start_point>
As a special case, you may use "A...B" as a shortcut for the merge base of A and B if there is exactly one merge base. You can leave out at most one of A and B, in which case it defaults to HEAD.
<tree-ish>
As a special case, you may use "A...B" as a shortcut for the merge base of A and B if there is exactly one merge base. You can leave out at most one of A and B, in which case it defaults to HEAD.
--
<pathspec>...:
For more details, see the pathspec entry in gitglossary(7).
HEAD normally refers to a named branch (e.g. master). Meanwhile, each branch refers to a specific commit. Let's look at a repo with three commits, one of them tagged, and with branch master checked out:
HEAD (refers to branch 'master')
|
v
a---b---c branch 'master' (refers to commit 'c')
^
|
tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
When a commit is created in this state, the branch is updated to refer to the new commit. Specifically, git commit creates a new commit d, whose parent is commit c, and then updates branch master to refer to new commit d. HEAD still refers to branch master and so indirectly now refers to commit d:
$ edit; git add; git commit
HEAD (refers to branch 'master')
|
v
a---b---c---d branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
^
|
tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
It is sometimes useful to be able to checkout a commit that is not at the tip of any named branch, or even to create a new commit that is not referenced by a named branch. Let's look at what happens when we checkout commit b (here we show two ways this may be done):
$ git checkout v2.0 # or
$ git checkout master^^
HEAD (refers to commit 'b')
|
v
a---b---c---d branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
^
|
tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
Notice that regardless of which checkout command we use, HEAD now refers directly to commit b. This is known as being in detached HEAD state. It means simply that HEAD refers to a specific commit, as opposed to referring to a named branch. Let's see what happens when we create a commit:
$ edit; git add; git commit
HEAD (refers to commit 'e')
|
v
e
/
a---b---c---d branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
^
|
tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
There is now a new commit e, but it is referenced only by HEAD. We can of course add yet another commit in this state:
$ edit; git add; git commit
HEAD (refers to commit 'f')
|
v
e---f
/
a---b---c---d branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
^
|
tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
In fact, we can perform all the normal Git operations. But, let's look at what happens when we then checkout master:
$ git checkout master
HEAD (refers to branch 'master')
e---f |
/ v
a---b---c---d branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
^
|
tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
It is important to realize that at this point nothing refers to commit f. Eventually commit f (and by extension commit e) will be deleted by the routine Git garbage collection process, unless we create a reference before that happens. If we have not yet moved away from commit f, any of these will create a reference to it:
$ git checkout -b foo (1) $ git branch foo (2) $ git tag foo (3)
| 1. |
creates a new branch
foo, which refers to commit
f, and then updates
HEAD
to refer to branch
foo. In other words, we'll no longer be in detached
HEAD
state after this command.
|
| 2. |
similarly creates a new branch
foo, which refers to commit
f, but leaves
HEAD
detached.
|
| 3. |
creates a new tag
foo, which refers to commit
f, leaving
HEAD
detached.
|
If we have moved away from commit f, then we must first recover its object name (typically by using git reflog), and then we can create a reference to it. For example, to see the last two commits to which HEAD referred, we can use either of these commands:
$ git reflog -2 HEAD # or $ git log -g -2 HEAD
When there is only one argument given and it is not -- (e.g. git checkout abc), and when the argument is both a valid <tree-ish> (e.g. a branch abc exists) and a valid <pathspec> (e.g. a file or a directory whose name is "abc" exists), Git would usually ask you to disambiguate. Because checking out a branch is so common an operation, however, git checkout abc takes "abc" as a <tree-ish> in such a situation. Use git checkout -- <pathspec> if you want to checkout these paths out of the index.
$ git checkout master (1) $ git checkout master~2 Makefile (2) $ rm -f hello.c $ git checkout hello.c (3)
| 1. |
switch branch
|
| 2. |
take a file out of another commit
|
| 3. |
restore
hello.c
from the index
|
$ git checkout -- '*.c'
Note the quotes around *.c. The file hello.c will also be checked out, even though it is no longer in the working tree, because the file globbing is used to match entries in the index (not in the working tree by the shell).
If you have an unfortunate branch that is named hello.c, this step would be confused as an instruction to switch to that branch. You should instead write:
$ git checkout -- hello.c
$ git checkout mytopic
However, your "wrong" branch and correct mytopic branch may differ in files that you have modified locally, in which case the above checkout would fail like this:
$ git checkout mytopic error: You have local changes to 'frotz'; not switching branches.
You can give the -m flag to the command, which would try a three-way merge:
$ git checkout -m mytopic Auto-merging frotz
After this three-way merge, the local modifications are not registered in your index file, so git diff would show you what changes you made since the tip of the new branch.
$ git checkout -m mytopic Auto-merging frotz ERROR: Merge conflict in frotz fatal: merge program failed
At this point, git diff shows the changes cleanly merged as in the previous example, as well as the changes in the conflicted files. Edit and resolve the conflict and mark it resolved with git add as usual:
$ edit frotz $ git add frotz
git-switch(1), git-restore(1)
Part of the git(1) suite