use MyMaths; my $l = MyMaths->new(1.2); my $r = MyMaths->new(3.4); print "A: ", $l + $r, "\n"; use myint; print "B: ", $l + $r, "\n"; { no myint; print "C: ", $l + $r, "\n"; } print "D: ", $l + $r, "\n"; no myint; print "E: ", $l + $r, "\n";
to give the output
A: 4.6 B: 4 C: 4.6 D: 4 E: 4.6
i.e., where "use myint;" is in effect, addition operations are forced to integer, whereas by default they are not, with the default behaviour being restored via "no myint;"
The minimal implementation of the package "MyMaths" would be something like this:
package MyMaths; use warnings; use strict; use myint(); use overload '+' => sub { my ($l, $r) = @_; # Pass 1 to check up one call level from here if (myint::in_effect(1)) { int($$l) + int($$r); } else { $$l + $$r; } }; sub new { my ($class, $value) = @_; bless \$value, $class; } 1;
Note how we load the user pragma "myint" with an empty list "()" to prevent its "import" being called.
The interaction with the Perl compilation happens inside package "myint":
package myint; use strict; use warnings; sub import { $^H{"myint/in_effect"} = 1; } sub unimport { $^H{"myint/in_effect"} = 0; } sub in_effect { my $level = shift // 0; my $hinthash = (caller($level))[10]; return $hinthash->{"myint/in_effect"}; } 1;
As pragmata are implemented as modules, like any other module, "use myint;" becomes
BEGIN { require myint; myint->import(); }
and "no myint;" is
BEGIN { require myint; myint->unimport(); }
Hence the "import" and "unimport" routines are called at compile time for the user's code.
User pragmata store their state by writing to the magical hash "%^H", hence these two routines manipulate it. The state information in "%^H" is stored in the optree, and can be retrieved read-only at runtime with "caller()", at index 10 of the list of returned results. In the example pragma, retrieval is encapsulated into the routine "in_effect()", which takes as parameter the number of call frames to go up to find the value of the pragma in the user's script. This uses "caller()" to determine the value of $^H{"myint/in_effect"} when each line of the user's script was called, and therefore provide the correct semantics in the subroutine implementing the overloaded addition.
The Perl core uses a handful of keys in "%^H" which do not follow this convention, because they predate it. Keys that follow the convention won't conflict with the core's historical keys.
Don't attempt to store references to data structures as integers which are retrieved via "caller" and converted back, as this will not be threadsafe. Accesses would be to the structure without locking (which is not safe for Perl's scalars), and either the structure has to leak, or it has to be freed when its creating thread terminates, which may be before the optree referencing it is deleted, if other threads outlive it.