use Async::MergePoint; my $merge = Async::MergePoint->new( needs => [ "leaves", "water" ], ); my $water; Kettle->boil( on_boiled => sub { $water = shift; $merge->done( "water" ); } ); my $tea_leaves; Cupboard->get_tea_leaves( on_fetched => sub { $tea_leaves = shift; $merge->done( "leaves" ); } ); $merge->close( on_finished => sub { # Make tea using $water and $tea_leaves } );
An asynchronous or event-based program could do this, but if each step involves some IO idle time, better overall performance can often be gained by running the steps in parallel. A "Async::MergePoint" object can then be used to wait for all of the steps to complete, before passing the combined result of each step on to the next stage.
A merge point maintains a set of outstanding operations it is waiting on; these are arbitrary string values provided at the object's construction. Each time the "done()" method is called, the named item is marked as being complete. When all of the required items are so marked, the "on_finished" continuation is invoked.
For use cases where code may be split across several different lexical scopes, it may not be convenient or possible to share a lexical variable, to pass on the result of some asynchronous operation. In these cases, when an item is marked as complete a value can also be provided which contains the results of that step. The "on_finished" callback is passed a hash (in list form, rather than by reference) of the collected item values.
This module was originally part of the IO::Async distribution, but was removed under the inspiration of Pedro Melo's Async::Hooks distribution, because it doesn't itself contain anything IO-specific.
The "on_finished" continuation will be called when every key in the "needs" list has been notified by the "done()" method. It will be called as
$on_finished->( %items )
where the %items hash will contain the item names that were waited on, and the values passed to the "done()" method for each one. Note that this is passed as a list, not as a HASH reference.
While this feature can be used to pass data from the component parts back up into the continuation, it may be more direct to use normal lexical variables instead. This method allows the continuation to be placed after the blocks of code that execute the component parts, so it reads downwards, and may make it more readable.
This method throws an exception if the MergePoint is already closed.
my $merge = Async::MergePoint->new(); foreach my $plugin ( $self->plugins ) { $plugin->handle_event( "event", $merge, @args ); } $merge->close( on_finished => sub { my %results = @_; print "All plugins have recognised $event\n"; } );
Each plugin that wishes to handle the event can use its own package name, for example, as its unique key name for the MergePoint. A plugin handling the event synchonously could perform something such as:
sub handle_event { my ( $event, $merge, @args ) = @_; .... $merge->needs( __PACKAGE__ ); $merge->done( __PACKAGE__ => $result ); }
Whereas, to handle the event asynchronously the plugin can instead perform:
sub handle_event { my ( $event, $merge, @args ) = @_; .... $merge->needs( __PACKAGE__ ); sometime_later( sub { $merge->done( __PACKAGE__ => $result ); } ); }