containers-policy.json - syntax for the signature verification policy file
Signature verification policy files are used to specify policy, e.g. trusted keys, applicable when deciding whether to accept an image, or individual signatures of that image, as valid.
By default, the policy is read from $HOME/.config/containers/policy.json, if it exists, otherwise from /etc/containers/policy.json; applications performing verification may allow using a different policy instead.
The signature verification policy file, usually called policy.json, uses a JSON format. Unlike some other JSON files, its parsing is fairly strict: unrecognized, duplicated or otherwise invalid fields cause the entire file, and usually the entire operation, to be rejected.
The purpose of the policy file is to define a set of policy requirements for a container image, usually depending on its location (where it is being pulled from) or otherwise defined identity.
Policy requirements can be defined for:
Usually, a scope can be defined to match a single image, and various prefixes of
such a most specific scope define namespaces of matching images.
- A default policy for a single transport, expressed using an empty string as a scope
- A global default policy.
If multiple policy requirements match a given image, only the requirements from the most specific match apply, the more general policy requirements definitions are ignored.
This is expressed in JSON using the top-level syntax
{
"default": [/* policy requirements: global default */]
"transports": {
transport_name: {
"": [/* policy requirements: default for transport $transport_name */],
scope_1: [/* policy requirements: default for $scope_1 in $transport_name */],
scope_2: [/*…*/]
/*…*/
},
transport_name_2: {/*…*/}
/*…*/
}
}
The global default set of policy requirements is mandatory; all of the other fields (transports itself, any specific transport, the transport-specific default, etc.) are optional.
The atomic: transport refers to images in an Atomic Registry.
Supported scopes use the form hostname[:port][/namespace[/imagestream [:tag]]], i.e. either specifying a complete name of a tagged image, or prefix denoting a host/namespace/image stream.
Note: The hostname and port refer to the Docker registry host and port (the one used e.g. for docker pull), not to the OpenShift API host and port.
The dir: transport refers to images stored in local directories.
Supported scopes are paths of directories (either containing a single image or subdirectories possibly containing images).
Note: The paths must be absolute and contain no symlinks. Paths violating these requirements may be silently ignored.
The top-level scope "/" is forbidden; use the transport default scope "", for consistency with other transports.
The docker: transport refers to images in a registry implementing the "Docker Registry HTTP API V2".
Scopes matching individual images are named Docker references in the fully expanded form, either using a tag or digest. For example, docker.io/library/busybox:latest (not busybox:latest).
More general scopes are prefixes of individual-image scopes, and specify a repository (by omitting the tag or digest), a repository namespace, or a registry host (by only specifying the host name).
The oci: transport refers to images in directories compliant with "Open Container Image Layout Specification".
Supported scopes use the form directory:tag, and directory referring to a directory containing one or more tags, or any of the parent directories.
Note: See dir: above for semantics and restrictions on the directory paths, they apply to oci: equivalently.
The tarball: transport refers to tarred up container root filesystems.
Scopes are ignored.
Using the mechanisms above, a set of policy requirements is looked up. The policy requirements are represented as a JSON array of individual requirement objects. For an image to be accepted, all of the requirements must be satisfied simulatenously.
The policy requirements can also be used to decide whether an individual signature is accepted (= is signed by a recognized key of a known author); in that case some requirements may apply only to some signatures, but each signature must be accepted by at least one requirement object.
The following requirement objects are supported:
A simple requirement with the following syntax
{"type":"insecureAcceptAnything"}
This requirement accepts any image (but note that other requirements in the array still apply).
When deciding to accept an individual signature, this requirement does not have any effect; it does not cause the signature to be accepted, though.
This is useful primarily for policy scopes where no signature verification is required; because the array of policy requirements must not be empty, this requirement is used to represent the lack of requirements explicitly.
A simple requirement with the following syntax:
{"type":"reject"}
This requirement rejects every image, and every signature.
This requirement requires an image to be signed with an expected identity, or accepts a signature if it is using an expected identity and key.
{
"type": "signedBy",
"keyType": "GPGKeys", /* The only currently supported value */
"keyPath": "/path/to/local/keyring/file",
"keyData": "base64-encoded-keyring-data",
"signedIdentity": identity_requirement
}
Exactly one of keyPath and keyData must be present, containing a GPG keyring of one or more public keys. Only signatures made by these keys are accepted.
The signedIdentity field, a JSON object, specifies what image identity the signature claims about the image. One of the following alternatives are supported:
{"type":"matchExact"}
(Note that with images identified using digest references, the digest from the reference is validated even before signature verification starts.)
{"type":"matchRepoDigestOrExact"}
{"type":"matchRepository"}
{
"type": "exactReference",
"dockerReference": docker_reference_value
}
{
"type": "exactRepository",
"dockerRepository": docker_repository_value
}
If the signedIdentity field is missing, it is treated as matchRepoDigestOrExact.
Note: matchExact, matchRepoDigestOrExact and matchRepository can be only used if a Docker-like image identity is provided by the transport. In particular, the dir: and oci: transports can be only used with exactReference or exactRepository.
It is strongly recommended to set the default policy to reject, and then selectively allow individual transports and scopes as desired.
(Note that the /*…*/ comments are not valid in JSON, and must not be used in real policies.)
{
"default": [{"type": "reject"}], /* Reject anything not explicitly allowed */
"transports": {
"docker": {
/* Allow installing images from a specific repository namespace, without cryptographic verification.
This namespace includes images like openshift/hello-openshift and openshift/origin. */
"docker.io/openshift": [{"type": "insecureAcceptAnything"}],
/* Similarly, allow installing the “official” busybox images. Note how the fully expanded
form, with the explicit /library/, must be used. */
"docker.io/library/busybox": [{"type": "insecureAcceptAnything"}]
/* Other docker: images use the global default policy and are rejected */
},
"dir": {
"": [{"type": "insecureAcceptAnything"}] /* Allow any images originating in local directories */
},
"atomic": {
/* The common case: using a known key for a repository or set of repositories */
"hostname:5000/myns/official": [
{
"type": "signedBy",
"keyType": "GPGKeys",
"keyPath": "/path/to/official-pubkey.gpg"
}
],
/* A more complex example, for a repository which contains a mirror of a third-party product,
which must be signed-off by local IT */
"hostname:5000/vendor/product": [
{ /* Require the image to be signed by the original vendor, using the vendor's repository location. */
"type": "signedBy",
"keyType": "GPGKeys",
"keyPath": "/path/to/vendor-pubkey.gpg",
"signedIdentity": {
"type": "exactRepository",
"dockerRepository": "vendor-hostname/product/repository"
}
},
{ /* Require the image to _also_ be signed by a local reviewer. */
"type": "signedBy",
"keyType": "GPGKeys",
"keyPath": "/path/to/reviewer-pubkey.gpg"
}
]
}
}
}
{
"default": [{"type": "insecureAcceptAnything"}]
}
atomic(1)
August 2018, Rename to containers-policy.json(5) by Valentin Rothberg vrothberg@suse.com <mailto:vrothberg@suse.com>
September 2016, Originally compiled by Miloslav Trmač mitr@redhat.com <mailto:mitr@redhat.com>